That’s my understanding of the guidelines in question. That said, they very much rely on complete transparency from all parties.So to conclude, if he's felt no ill affects since the incident took place he's good to play on Monday, if he's had any ill affects since the incident he won't be available.
Including the main man himself. If he felt a bit sick/headache/dizzy on his day off on Tuesday but felt fine when he arrived at training on Wednesday, I doubt he would say he'd been unwell the previous day.That’s my understanding of the guidelines in question. That said, they very much rely on complete transparency from all parties.
Firstly, I would have thought he would have been closely monitored on his day off and may well also have been told not to attend training for the rest of the week. Secondly I would hope that increasing awareness of the potential dangers of concussion would mean that players would take any symptoms seriously.Including the main man himself. If he felt a bit sick/headache/dizzy on his day off on Tuesday but felt fine when he arrived at training on Wednesday, I doubt he would say he'd been unwell the previous day.
Feeling nauseous while being in Ply*outh is not necessarily a sign of concussion to be fair. Just good taste.Including the main man himself. If he felt a bit sick/headache/dizzy on his day off on Tuesday but felt fine when he arrived at training on Wednesday, I doubt he would say he'd been unwell the previous day.
He'd probably attend training even if he wasn't doing any physical training, perhaps just listening to the post match analysis and discussion for the upcoming game, plus I'm sure our medical team would want to assess him.Firstly, I would have thought he would have been closely monitored on his day off and may well also have been told not to attend training for the rest of the week. Secondly I would hope that increasing awareness of the potential dangers of concussion would mean that players would take any symptoms seriously.
You are Gary Cauldwell and I win £5on the grass