• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Politics Today

arthur

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
10,575
It is not Brexit per se that we are talking about here mind.
No, it's the Brexit constituencies. The coalition that Johnson and Cummings assembled versus the "metropolitan liberal elitist establishment". Mind you, how 48% of those who voted can be called an elite is something I'll never understand.

The problem with this strategy for Sunak is that his "Brexit constituency" is smaller than it was and opposition to it is larger. His policy is polling well among 2019's first time voters (aka red wall), but the Tory majorities there are small, and there are many other reasons for these voters not to vote Tory again.

At the same time his policy is polling badly in the blue wall, so the net result of this policy shift will still be negative I think.
 

Alistair20000

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
50,425
Location
Avoiding the Hundred
No, it's the Brexit constituencies. The coalition that Johnson and Cummings assembled versus the "metropolitan liberal elitist establishment". Mind you, how 48% of those who voted can be called an elite is something I'll never understand.

The problem with this strategy for Sunak is that his "Brexit constituency" is smaller than it was and opposition to it is larger. His policy is polling well among 2019's first time voters (aka red wall), but the Tory majorities there are small, and there are many other reasons for these voters not to vote Tory again.

At the same time his policy is polling badly in the blue wall, so the net result of this policy shift will still be negative I think.
Time will tell. I sense no great enthusiasm for Sir Keith and politically he is not that savvy. Not a Blair or a Wilson.
 

tavyred

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 23, 2004
Messages
13,083
You do realise that our biggest reduction in carbon emissions came during the 1990s when we dashed for gas? Progress since 2010 has been much less impressive. I suppose the fact that you use 1990 as the date to measure our performance against is entirely coincidental.

Some examples on how we have "led the world" since 2010 would be much appreciated
I’m surprised that you’re unaware of why 1990 is widely used as the baseline year for judging the efforts of countries in the battle against greenhouse gasses Art. 🤷‍♂️
P1ss poor eco-warrior skills on display from you here Art! 😎
 

arthur

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
10,575
I’m surprised that you’re unaware of why 1990 is widely used as the baseline year for judging the efforts of countries in the battle against greenhouse gasses Art. 🤷‍♂️
P1ss poor eco-warrior skills on display from you here Art! 😎
It's you who describe me as an eco warrior, not me. All part of your relentless straw man strategy
 

arthur

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
10,575
Time will tell. I sense no great enthusiasm for Sir Keith and politically he is not that savvy. Not a Blair or a Wilson.
His political savviness is indeed in doubt, but his leadership skills are demonstrably very good. How many commentators thought that the basket case that was the Labour Party in 2019 would be poised for victory in less than two parliaments? The best that most predicted for Starmer was that he would be Kinnock, doing the hard remedial work and preparing the ground for a subsequent leader's victory. Even you must give him credit for what he has achieved Shirley?
 
Top