Post Count

[LOG]

I've always considered posts per day a better yardstick.

Somewhere between 8.80 and 8.90 is the optimal level according to the ONS.

 

[RaeUK]

7.41 piffle I just don't measure up ...

 

[DJH2005]

 

[EX4 6PX]

I've always considered posts per day a better yardstick.

Somewhere between 8.80 and 8.90 is the optimal level according to the ONS.

Is that the Office of National Statistics, or is it some new kind of Exeweb Steering Group Sub-Committee, that I haven't caught up with yet?

 

[Grecian_In_Exile]

7.41 piffle I just don't measure up ...

True story

 

[Bondy]

Why display the number of posts that a user has made?

Surely it's led to the cult of the personality on here. As so emminently shown this week with many making fools of themselves, Exeweb, the Trust and the Club.

By not having it, we'd all be a lot more equal.

I agree just stick it in the profile, if people are really that bothered they will look there

 

[RaeUK]

It might just be how the software works ...

 

[Stuffy]

7.41 piffle I just don't measure up ...

Add thousands to your score ...


... tell us what your listening to ...

 

[Snakebite]

Or, here's a thought now. Why not just leave it as it is? Stop meddling, the world will keep turning and everything will be fine and dandy just as it is.

Nobody gives a crap about post count except those who are either insecure or think this place is a ******* contest.

 

[feverpitch]

Or, here's a thought now. Why not just leave it as it is? Stop meddling, the world will keep turning and everything will be fine and dandy just as it is.

Nobody gives a crap about post count except those who are either insecure or think this place is a ******* contest.

Nail. On. Head.