Well when you post when I'm offline then reply when I'm still offline, then hey...When silences speak volumes.....bizarre partisan allegiance to the Republican Party appears to preclude just answering honestly...altogether now "Trumpy's going down, he's going down, he's going, Trumpy's going down!" Just listen to that news and rejoice!
As with everything else Trump related over the years, I'm sure the truth will out. I trust the BBC as far as I could throw it when it comes to Trump, as when it comes to figures from the right outside the UK the BBC is never knowingly unbiased.
I'm sure it's entirely coincidental that the news came out the same day that it was found that Biden has all but been confirmed as having received bribes from Burisma, with the other party now confirming he has conversations on tape. As for what the allegations relate to - well anything involving nuclear, for example, is moot, as all nuclear codes etc. are changed with such frequency that the minute Trump left the White House any paperwork related to nuclear would have been out of date. What's also key is that the President is able to declassify documents pretty much at will (and a look around the lock-ups of Obama, Bush, Clinton etc. will also reveal piles of declassified documents presumably of equal importance). What is totally illegal is Vice Presidents doing so. So, Mr Biden, just *why* are there stacks of documents from your time as VP sitting in your garage and other offices - were you just looking after them for a friend? Was the money from Burisma just resting in your account?
The USA, which has always prided itself (probably falsely) on being a true democracy, is now engaged in activities that would draw comparisons with the likes of Nazarbayev. Anywhere else where the ex-President was being pursued by the sitting government with a scattergun approach like this would probably have Amnesty International sniffing around.
And no, before you reply "hyper-partisan, Republican etc. etc." you may wish to take a look back to 2016 when I suggested a "None of the above" vote. I would have voted Trump in 2020 on the basis of much of his record - especially the Abraham Accords, for example. I think he has many faults, as I explained on here before (and you acknowledged), and personally I don't think he should run in 2024. I do, however, recognise a witch-hunt when I see one.