i8cornwall
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2006
- Messages
- 2,745
I think that is what did happen from an outsider looking in point of view and still does now. I must say that since I've had more contact with trustee's through RL activities that this isn't true at all and they are really helpful and broken the sterotype i had of them. I guess people will vote for people they can relate to and feel they will act within there Interest and ideas for the trust/club.I can see how that may have arisen i8cornwall. I also find it dubious when individuals around the 'top table' of an organisation all appear to be suit wearing men of a certain age. For all the experience they may bring, they also can stifle progress and growth and inadvertently perhaps promote a culture of exclusivity and insularity.
Having said all that. I am looking for certain aspects from a trust candidate that sit alongside my own requirements as a fan, a fan with hidden disabilities, my values as a person and what i demand of the club as a paying customer and Richard Knight seems to be at the top of my list at the moment although i'm undecided. From his photo on the manifesto page on the trust website he also looks like someone who would fit well into an 'old boys club' (no offence intended) but what's important is that we get people in positions of responsibility who have 100% integrity and who put the fans and the club first.
I wouldn't necessarily vote for a younger candidate just because they are young and can appeal better to younger fans although i can appreciate they may be less set in their ways and amenable to change and open to ideas as a result of their youth.
Now if that means a suite wearing middle age person gets voted in is that down to the trust or the "type" (I use that word very losly and don't wish to cause offence to anyone) of people that had been voting and interacting with the trust?