• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

International relations thread

arthur

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
11,943
I think you'd find that if Ukraine's existence depended on it, and they possessed nuclear weapons, they'd have used them Art.
Knowing that they'd have been instantly wiped out by Putin? I thought nuclear weapons were supposed to be a deterrent... Putin's nukes would, according to Alistair, have deterred Zelenski from using his
 
Last edited:

Grecian2K

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
33,263
Location
Busy knitting muesli
Mind you, based on the recent examples I fear that any of those mega-expensive Yankee fireworks that Lockheed pushed on to us were fired from Faslane it would not be the residents of Moscow who would be trembling...more likely the good folk of Milngavie or Motherwell.
 

Alistair20000

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
52,921
Location
Avoiding the Hundred
Knowing that they'd have been instantly wiped out by Putin? I thought nuclear weapons were supposed to be a deterrent... Putin's nukes would, according to Alistair, have deterred Zelenski from using his
You have heard of Mutually Assured Destruction art. A principle that avoided use of nuclear weapons during the Cold War.

Don't you find it odd that countries that have these weapons do not want to give them up and others are trying to acquire them and yet you want to give them up. 🤷‍♂️
 

Alistair20000

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
52,921
Location
Avoiding the Hundred
Mind you, based on the recent examples I fear that any of those mega-expensive Yankee fireworks that Lockheed pushed on to us were fired from Faslane it would not be the residents of Moscow who would be trembling...more likely the good folk of Milngavie or Motherwell.
Yes a fair point based on the trial. Hopefully the problems are being addressed.
 

Spanks

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
1,620
Knowing that they'd have been instantly wiped out by Putin? I thought nuclear weapons were supposed to be a deterrent... Putin's nukes would, according to Alistair, have deterred Zelenski from using his
Well, yes Art. You're being unusually silly with this one.

I literally wrote "that if Ukrainian existence depended on it", i.e. if they wouldn't exist anyway without the use of it, then they surely would use the ultimate deterrent, because they'd be going to hell in a handcart anyways. The point is moot, because Vlad wouldn't have gone near Kiev if they'd still possessed them.
 

Phil Sayers

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
10,805
Location
Kernow - battering a drunken Octopus
To give a real world example (aside from the bombs on Japan I think probably the only time using nuclear weapons has been seriously considered) the Israeli war cabinet in 1973 were completely stunned at the outset of the war and had provisionally decided to use nuclear weapons if the situation got to one where either Syria or Egypt were able to sever Israel into two or more parts by reaching the sea. It was Nixon and Kissinger discovering that thinking (and concluding they couldn't really object both because they thought that would be their decision too if they were in Israel's shoes and also because they weren't meant to know Israel's thinking / that they had the bomb) that was part of the reason for a massive airlift of conventional weapons.

There was all-round misunderstanding on all sides in that it looked to Israel like Syria and Egypt were intent and capable of removing Israel from the map, in which case they had decided (whether they would have gone through with it is an unknown) to use nuclear weapons to prevent the existential destruction of the country. On the Syrian / Egyptian side they did not know that Israel had nukes (don't know whether they suspected it but they didn't know for sure) but in any event they were not trying to wipe Israel out but instead just recover what they had lost in 1967. I suspect that if they had known for sure that Israel had nukes it would not have deterred their actual goal (because they figured Israel would not go nuclear over the Sinai and Golan Heights) but probably would have deterred their perceived goal and had them on the phone to Israel saying 'we are not coming for Tel Aviv, you are not in an existential situation'.

All supposition but I think the most likely effect of a nuclear-armed Ukraine would have been Putin not feeling much / at all deterred about trying to take the remainder of the Donbas but would have deterred his wider goal of completely conquering the country.
 

DB9

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
24,985
Location
Hampshire. Heart's in N Devon
I wish the Navalny (RIP) funeral was a catalyst for something else.
 

Radio Free Skaro

Active member
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Messages
1,390
Location
Chaddington
Russia claiming that UK troops are on the ground in Ukraine. Should we be pleased , not surprised or worried if this is the case?
 

iscalad

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Messages
26,782
Location
Far away across the field
Russia claiming that UK troops are on the ground in Ukraine. Should we be pleased , not surprised or worried if this is the case?
Ask the Germans, they seem to know all about it.
 

Radio Free Skaro

Active member
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Messages
1,390
Location
Chaddington
Ask the Germans, they seem to know all about it.
why Is that significant.
 
Top