LOG
Very well known Exeweb poster
For all this talk of discrimination, do you know if the women’s side have actually been told that they cannot play at SJP, bearing in mind that, in the season just gone, they did?It’s Not about you liking women’s football, it’s about the club doing the right thing and allowing the women to play at SJP and growing the women’s side in the city.
I don’t know what you know about the past, but, as I understand things, the primary reason that they didn’t play there before was that Tisdale didn’t want the additional wear on the pitch. Was this discrimination or was it that his priority was the men’s first team and trying to gain any advantage possible? Like it or not, the men’s first was and is the club’s priority too because that’s where the crowds and money are. However, that nobody seemed to object to the women playing the match at SJP last season would suggest that there isn’t an ingrained discrimination amongst the decision makers.
Additionally, do we know whether the women’s team would actually want to play every match at SJP, knowing that it would be about 98% empty? Playing there would probably have a positive effect on attendances over time but our women’s side is still at a very early stage of development so perhaps it might be better for them to play their bread and butter matches at Cully, grow and develop the side and then maybe play a handful of bigger matches at SJP each season?
For what it’s worth, and from the snippets I’ve picked up along the way, the development of the women’s team in years gone by wasn't hampered by not being able to play at SJP but by the way in which they ran themselves where they were quite happy to enjoy the benefits of playing under the ECFC badge whilst making little or no effort to engage with any other part of the club. Thankfully, that seems to be very different now but there's a lot of making up for lost time that needs to be done.
If you know better, I’m happy to be corrected.