denzel
Very well known Exeweb poster
Yes, 5 was Piergianni who actually looked decent.Try their number 3 Sturtz, the left back.
Yes, 5 was Piergianni who actually looked decent.Try their number 3 Sturtz, the left back.
He's always impressed me whenever I've seen him against us. He's dominant in his own box and carries a threat in ours.Yes, 5 was Piergianni who actually looked decent.
Aye Dan Butler. A bit of a Cnut who was very lucky not to have been given his marching orders.Try their number 3 Sturtz, the left back.
I've offered to take pictures on two separate occasions, however this is built on trust, I'm more then happy to provide a photo.Picture would of course be lovely ......
To Lee Anderson, that's over 16 meals.I've offered to take pictures on two separate occasions, however this is built on trust, I'm more then happy to provide a photo.
Five pounds is pocket money to most of us who work, however to a single parent, that's lunchboxes for three days...
Agreed, Stevenage did have their fair share of raw meat eaters, very physical team, Alex McDonald looked particularly Neanderthal, even Jamie Reid looks to.have "bulked out". Thought we handled the physical challenge well.Aye Dan Butler. A bit of a Cnut who was very lucky not to have been given his marching orders.
I've not had the opportunity to see much of Alli yet, but seems that him and Cox both offer different elements that could compliment each other? Neither the complete package as a line leader, but both can also drop deeper/wider, offering different things? Obviously both have a lot of space for development, but could we see the two of them together with it a bit more fluid in terms of who is the "9"?I was grilled by I think was Harris earlier in the season about how I didn't think Nombe was a "Caldwell striker" and asked for details around that
Alli, although a WIP has attributes that I think were missing with Nombe but still offers a physical presence - namely having very good feet and being able to play with his back to goal
GC favours a more technical game to his predecessor and has brought in a lot of players comfortable on the ball
Think we'll see him develop well next season, it seems like we view him as a project to make into a 9 as it's not always where he's played for Halifax I think?
Was talking about this with mate yesterday at the game - there have been some occasions where we’ve switched to two up front during the game this year so I don’t think that’s totally out of the questionI've not had the opportunity to see much of Alli yet, but seems that him and Cox both offer different elements that could compliment each other? Neither the complete package as a line leader, but both can also drop deeper/wider, offering different things? Obviously both have a lot of space for development, but could we see the two of them together with it a bit more fluid in terms of who is the "9"?
If you've got players who can do a bit of either, you don't even have to chooseWas talking about this with mate yesterday at the game - there have been some occasions where we’ve switched to two up front during the game this year so I don’t think that’s totally out of the question
In my mind mind the no.9 in our current system remains very isolated and waiting for scraps or moments - I definitely wouldn’t be against GC switch it up from his favourite of two 10s behind a 9 to one 10 behind two 9s