MJP_Exeter
Well-known Exeweb poster
That's nice.I'm really not sure many people give a monkey's chuff about your crusade to be proved right or wrong
That's nice.I'm really not sure many people give a monkey's chuff about your crusade to be proved right or wrong
All managers (and players) have to prove themselves at new clubs. It is what they do at that club that matters, not what they have done elsewhere. We have seen many a player do well here after apparently stinking the place out elsewhere to know that an open mind in the first few weeks doesn't do any harm. GC seems to have been starting with a negative stack loaded against him as far as yourself goes though.We haven't sacked a manager since the 02/03 season.
Under trust ownership we've never sacked a manager.
I don't want any failure at all, but thus far hugely uninspired by Caldwell and to me he has to prove his ability to be successful with us. Based on the evidence of here and now I am not convinced he is the man to bring this to our club.
Obviously success is relative and let's be honest the club ain't removing him anytime soon, so can only really be hopeful I'm wrong
Only telling it as it is. You havent gained many converts judging by just how many posters have challenged you but you dig yourself deeper into your bunkerThat's nice.
It's a forum based on opinions essentially.Only telling it as it is. You havent gained many converts judging by just how many posters have challenged you but you dig yourself deeper into your bunker
I don't. A lot of our fans for some strange reason have taken an instant dislike to GC including MJF (Or whatever his name is) and will take great delight in being proved right if it all goes wrong. Personally it's far too early to make a judgement on him either way.I'm really not sure many people give a monkey's chuff about your crusade to be proved right or wrong
If Caldwell ends up being terrible for us, what delight is there to take?I don't. A lot of our fans for some strange reason have taken an instant dislike to GC including MJF (Or whatever his name is) and will take great delight in being proved right if it all goes wrong. Personally it's far too early to make a judgement on him either way.
We haven't sacked a manager since the 02/03 season.]
It will go south at some point, managers are 99 percent of the time relieved of their duties when managing a football club. It feels weirdly like many want GC to fail and soon!?
This isn’t an amazing look in to the future you’re giving by saying “if Caldwell goes the way I think” - yes he will be sacked one day that’s football
Largely because we painted ourselves into a corner with a ridiculous contract for Tisdale. He should have walked in the year when we won 3 home games in 12 months.We haven't sacked a manager since the 02/03 season.
Under trust ownership we've never sacked a manager.
I don't want any failure at all, but thus far hugely uninspired by Caldwell and to me he has to prove his ability to be successful with us. Based on the evidence of here and now I am not convinced he is the man to bring this to our club.
Obviously success is relative and let's be honest the club ain't removing him anytime soon, so can only really be hopeful I'm wrong
In fairness, whatever your opinion for or against, there was never a will from within the club to sack Tisdale irrespetive of contract arrangements. Whether the two playoff finals where enough to prove a turnaround was a matter for personal opinion. Remember the trust members called contract to time, not Tagg or the club. In hindsight it was a good call of those whom actively pursued it.Largely because we painted ourselves into a corner with a ridiculous contract for Tisdale. He should have walked in the year when we won 3 home games in 12 months.
They couldn’t even if they’d wanted toIn fairness, whatever your opinion for or against, there was never a will from within the club to sack Tisdale irrespective of contract arrangements. Whether the two playoff finals where enough to prove a turnaround was a matter for personal opinion. Remember the trust members called contract to time, not Tagg or the club. In hindsight it was a good call of those whom actively pursued it.