Bittners a Legend
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2005
- Messages
- 4,749
I think it is fair to say that the Tisdale style of passing and pressing is now long gone. We have played some pretty dire stuff for 18 months now, with the odd David Noble exception. Certainly the crisp passing of previous years is long gone.
So do we have a style? In so many of the games I've seen this season we have lumped the ball long for Cureton. We don't even knock it in behind the centre backs for Curo to run on to, we just hoof it aimlessly up in the air. Does Tisdale want us to play this way? Presumably not?
I didn't mind us not utilising wingers, many top clubs now tend to play a much more compact and tighter game which involves high pressing and slide rule passes in behind the centre backs but it is clear we do not do this any longer. So why the opposition to wide players? Do we need a target man? Does Tisdale see either Bauza or O'Flynn as target men? (as bizarre as that might seem).
Do people enjoy the way we play the game anymore? It is clear from comments that opposing managers have made recently (Brendan Rodgers, John Sheridan etc) that people within the game associate Tisdale with a progressing, attractive, passing game...but is that the reality any longer? Are injuries to blame?
I don't know what to think, but I sense our style is dreadful and Tisdale has completely failed to impose any sort of identity or style on our current bunch of players. Perhaps we do still play an attractive game and I've just been unfortunate to pick the worst games...!
So do we have a style? In so many of the games I've seen this season we have lumped the ball long for Cureton. We don't even knock it in behind the centre backs for Curo to run on to, we just hoof it aimlessly up in the air. Does Tisdale want us to play this way? Presumably not?
I didn't mind us not utilising wingers, many top clubs now tend to play a much more compact and tighter game which involves high pressing and slide rule passes in behind the centre backs but it is clear we do not do this any longer. So why the opposition to wide players? Do we need a target man? Does Tisdale see either Bauza or O'Flynn as target men? (as bizarre as that might seem).
Do people enjoy the way we play the game anymore? It is clear from comments that opposing managers have made recently (Brendan Rodgers, John Sheridan etc) that people within the game associate Tisdale with a progressing, attractive, passing game...but is that the reality any longer? Are injuries to blame?
I don't know what to think, but I sense our style is dreadful and Tisdale has completely failed to impose any sort of identity or style on our current bunch of players. Perhaps we do still play an attractive game and I've just been unfortunate to pick the worst games...!