arthur
Very well known Exeweb poster
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2004
- Messages
- 10,145
..plus a universal right to affordable rented housing just as there is a universal right to free health and education provision
Your first sentence is undoubtedly correct. But I doubt the veracity of the second one - the LTN has made it almost impossible for invading aliens to get anywhere near chez JinxPS: I presume that you didn't actually read the article? Probably too busy fighting off the North London "Albanians" with your pitchfork.
It would appear that 5 million of our number are actually currently engaged in a pilot scheme for UBI.Universal Basic Income- you know it makes sense...
I'm never sure of this "living on benefits" being a viable option. If I'm 55 and unable/unwilling to seriously look for work because I've never felt fully recovered from long covid what sort of monthly income would I receive? Is this a realistic lifestyle choice as people seem to suggest?It would appear that 5 million of our number are actually currently engaged in a pilot scheme for UBI.![]()
I might suggest for many that living on benefits is not only viable, but preferable. I know a number of people who have been offered extra hours at work that have turned them down because it would affect the amount of benefits they’d receive. They would rather have benefit money than wages.I'm never sure of this "living on benefits" being a viable option. If I'm 55 and unable/unwilling to seriously look for work because I've never felt fully recovered from long covid what sort of monthly income would I receive? Is this a realistic lifestyle choice as people seem to suggest?
Could someone answer the question about how much income my imaginary 55 year old would receive? (Assume they are living mortgage free in a Band B house).I might suggest for many that living on benefits is not only viable, but preferable. I know a number of people who have been offered extra hours at work that have turned them down because it would affect the amount of benefits they’d receive. They would rather have benefit money than wages.
No idea, but the people I referred to range from 20s to 50s, have families and live in houses. Whether they’re their own or are rented I wouldn’t know.Could someone answer the question about how much income my imaginary 55 year old would receive? (Assume they are living mortgage free in a Band B house).
This is not a trick question, I simply don't know
You are talking about people receiving in work benefits, so that their income is made up of a mixture of benefits and wages. This system is proven to be flawed as mentioned in post 46465.No idea, but the people I referred to range from 20s to 50s, have families and live in houses. Whether they’re their own or are rented I wouldn’t know.
….and a land flowing with milk and honey...plus a universal right to affordable rented housing just as there is a universal right to free health and education provision
I would argue that with regard to a hierarchy of needs, having somewhere secure to live is more important than having access to free education….and a land flowing with milk and honey.