• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Ribeiro

citytillidie72

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
5,355
Location
exeter
I'm pretty certain it was a back four. There was no one further right than bennett until ribeiro came on and he got moved
 

crocks

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Messages
10,650
Location
Swindon
I thought it was a 3, as Woody was pushed up on the left and Oakley was the left of the three.
 

Pobbop

Active member
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
3,653
Location
Exeter
I thought it was a back four.
Me too, think with Tis the shape changed a little at times, but basically it was Bennett r-b, Oaks and Danny c-h, and Woodman l-b.
 

Avening Posse

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Dec 31, 2013
Messages
10,173
Location
Sydney
Not sure, I agree with GOG in that it probably changed a bit throughout the match, I sat in the cowshed today towards the away end and am therefore certain Scot was playing right back for at least the first 20 minutes of the 2nd half
 

scottus86

Active member
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
2,956
Location
Crediton
Looked like 3 center backs with Woodman and Nicholls playing wing backs. It seemed to change in to a back four when we were attacking depending on the wing we were attacking down.
 

andrew p long

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
12,768
Location
Hagley, Stourbridge
Looked like 3 center backs with Woodman and Nicholls playing wing backs. It seemed to change in to a back four when we were attacking depending on the wing we were attacking down.
That's what I thought too (as I've posted on the Match day thread) - 3-4-1-2. A bit surprising that Cheltenham didn't try to use a pacy left winger; that was where we were vulnerable (until Ribeiro came on abd Bennett went to centre mid.
 
Top